Lucky Loves Holly, No Den Cam in 2016 - UPDATE January 28, 2016
Red squirrel eating snow
Red squirrel eating snow

Yesterday at 11:03 AM, Lucky made gentle, friendly advances to Holly, including some licking 4 minutes and 22 seconds into the video. Holly wasn?t excited about it at first but relaxed and ended up initiating play at 5 minutes and 10 seconds in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2CkvuELml0Lucky?s advances may have set the mood for later in the day. At 7:39 PM, they had a great time lying down and wrestling in this 12-minute video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZPyA7rW834Play resumed at 9:43 PM when a Lily Fan captured this 15-minute video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPnyhoJBYSw. At that time, it would be nearly pitch dark in the den for the bears, but the infrared light illuminates the scene for us.
On a different topic, Manny the mannequin is getting attention. We are loading him with food to bring birds. And squirrels, as it turns out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIMCPlIUQUg. I would love it if this led to interns and Bear Educators working with parents and children to have birds land on their hands. It is hard to beat trust and contact in creating fond memories and instilling a lasting love of wildlife.
At 4 PM today, the 72 hours allowed for a decision on the Den Cam was within minutes of being up. Based on my information at that time, it would be unwise to go ahead. It would nearly impossible to place the den shed and install the Den Cam. The live footage would not be as effective for education as it could have been earlier in the season. And I had concerns for the safety of Lily and Jewel if we went ahead. I wrote:
Lou, thank you for the DNR response we received on January 25, 2016, to our Den Cam Permit Application of November 5, 2015. Granting a single Den Cam is a step in the right direction. However, the timing and conditions of the permit make it unworkable this year for a number of reasons:
1. The 81-day delay in the response put us into a season with snow conditions that now make logistics nearly impossible.
2. Being able to comply with some of the permit conditions would be difficult within the viewing time frame that is left for the season. To make the educational purpose of this Den Cam effective, including coordinating with educators, developing curricula with spring break coming up, would be difficult to accomplish within the viewing time left this winter.
3. We had asked for the ability to maintain the Den Cams to maintain a data stream for research and educational purposes. We had asked not to be limited to an unscientific sample size in the number of Den Cams. The permit restrictions limit us to one den cam and make it difficult to maintain in a timely manner.
4. We believe the welfare of Lily and Jewel, two of the denning bears we had hoped to observe with Den Cams, would be better served by not having to reveal their locations.
I had hoped to work with the DNR this winter and show the world what we can accomplish together. Let?s try again next winter.
Lynn Rogers
To Lily Fans I say, I especially would have loved to see what students and all of us could have seen in this den with its unusually good visibility. I would have loved people around the world to follow Jewel and her cub(s) and see how Jewel deals with the wound in her side. Can she reach it with her tongue? Has it healed in the 5 months since we first saw it? How many cubs? I would have loved to increase our sample size from this additional den. But the downsides were too big. Among them, sadly, was concern for the bears, given recent history. I?ll get as much information over the winter as we legally can.
I hadn?t noticed red squirrels eating snow before, but where else would they find moisture this time of year? This squirrel happened to be doing that when I snapped his picture through the window.
Thank you for all you do.
Lynn Rogers, Biologist, Wildlife Research Institute and North American Bear Center