Did human hunting activities alone drive great auks' extinction?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/11/191126121215.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fplants_animals%2Fbirds+%28Birds+News+--+ScienceDaily%29Researchers study chickens, ostriches, penguins to learn how flight feathers evolved
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/11/191127161439.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fplants_animals%2Fbirds+%28Birds+News+--+ScienceDaily%29Paper: The Making of a Flight Feather: Bio-architectural Principles and Adaptation
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(19)31229-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867419312292%3Fshowall%3Dtrue(A and A′) Representative molecular control and morphological transition during rachis morphogenesis. Conceptual diagram based on data from Figures 1D and 6A (A). Two distinct strategies for optimizing rachis architecture of flight feathers used in birds with burst (i.e., chickens) versus sustained (i.e., eagles) flight modes (A′). Early birds use a powerful shaft architecture and more complex composite beam type architectures. Modern sustained flying birds show a trend toward a simpler design with a strong but light shaft. Based on data from Figure 2.
(B) Schematic drawings showing increased complexity of feather branching morphogenesis. Overall feather shape is based on barb branches that progress from radial symmetry (Harris et al., 2005, Yu et al., 2002) to bilateral symmetric (Yue et al., 2005, Yue et al., 2006), to bilateral asymmetry (Li et al., 2017). Three barbule shapes (Figure 6B), filamentous (light blue), plate (blue), and hooklet-bearing (dark blue) are shown. Vane formation based on overlapping plate barbules (middle panel) or the hooklet mechanism (2nd from the right) allows fluffy 3D plumulaceous branches to be organized into a 2D vane plane.